Screener
PID vs IDVZ
Invesco International Dividend Achievers ETF vs Polen International Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- PID costs 0.22% less per year.
- PID is significantly larger than IDVZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PID follows a index tracking strategy; IDVZ uses active selection.
- PID has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PID | IDVZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.53% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $929M | $155M |
| Since | 2005 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 3.28% | 2.67% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.6% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.72% | 11.89% |
| Max drawdown | -46.07% | -10.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PID and IDVZ
Explore further