Screener
DOG vs SH
ProShares Short Dow30 vs ProShares Short S&P500
Key differences
- SH costs 0.06% less per year.
- SH is significantly larger than DOG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, DOG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DOG | SH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.89% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $111M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2006 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 3.42% | 4.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | -14.4% | -19.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | -8.5% | -13.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -5.8% | -9.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.85 | -1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.18% | 11.96% |
| Max drawdown | -70.40% | -75.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DOG and SH
Explore further