Screener
DRIV vs ARKQ
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF vs ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
Key differences
- DRIV costs 0.07% less per year.
- ARKQ is significantly larger than DRIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DRIV follows a index tracking strategy; ARKQ uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, ARKQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DRIV | ARKQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $401M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2018 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.85% | 0.24% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +83.8% | +76.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.3% | +41.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.3% | +12.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.79 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.94% | 32.38% |
| Max drawdown | -41.93% | -59.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DRIV and ARKQ
Explore further