Screener
DRIV vs ARKX
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF vs ARK Space & Defense Innovation ETF
Key differences
- DRIV costs 0.07% less per year.
- DRIV follows a index tracking strategy; ARKX uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, ARKX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DRIV | ARKX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $401M | $893M |
| Since | 2018 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.85% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +83.8% | +74.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.3% | +37.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.3% | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.79 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.94% | 32.30% |
| Max drawdown | -41.93% | -43.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DRIV and ARKX
Explore further