Screener
DRSK vs RULE
Aptus Defined Risk ETF vs Adaptive Core ETF
Key differences
- DRSK costs 1.06% less per year.
- DRSK is significantly larger than RULE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DRSK is classified as alternative, while RULE is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- DRSK follows a option income strategy; RULE uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, RULE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DRSK | RULE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 1.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $14M |
| Since | 2018 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 3.72% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.1% | +41.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.0% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.23% | 19.69% |
| Max drawdown | -19.87% | -30.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DRSK and RULE
Explore further