Screener
DUG vs IXC
ProShares UltraShort Energy ETF vs iShares Global Energy ETF
Key differences
- IXC costs 0.55% less per year.
- IXC is significantly larger than DUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DUG follows a inverse strategy; IXC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IXC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DUG | IXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18M | $2.8B |
| Since | 2007 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 5.09% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | inverse | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -52.2% | +46.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | -27.2% | +17.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -39.2% | +20.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.61 | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.83% | 18.71% |
| Max drawdown | -99.46% | -64.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DUG and IXC
Explore further