Screener
IXC vs DIG
iShares Global Energy ETF vs ProShares Ultra Energy
Key differences
- IXC costs 0.55% less per year.
- IXC is significantly larger than DIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IXC follows a index tracking strategy; DIG uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, DIG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXC | DIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.8B | $85M |
| Since | 2001 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 1.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.6% | +85.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.6% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.4% | +30.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.71% | 40.85% |
| Max drawdown | -64.16% | -92.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXC and DIG
Explore further