Screener
DUG vs RSPG
ProShares UltraShort Energy ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
Key differences
- RSPG costs 0.55% less per year.
- RSPG is significantly larger than DUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DUG follows a inverse strategy; RSPG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, RSPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DUG | RSPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18M | $624M |
| Since | 2007 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 5.09% | 1.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -52.2% | +46.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | -27.2% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -39.2% | +22.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.61 | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.83% | 21.70% |
| Max drawdown | -99.46% | -73.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DUG and RSPG
Explore further