Screener
DURA vs CGDV
VanEck Durable High Dividend ETF vs Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
Key differences
- CGDV is significantly larger than DURA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DURA follows a index tracking strategy; CGDV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGDV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DURA | CGDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $38M | $33.0B |
| Since | 2018 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.28% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.9% | +33.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.9% | +25.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.64 | 1.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.72% | 11.75% |
| Max drawdown | -33.15% | -21.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DURA and CGDV
Explore further