Screener
DYTA vs MATE
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF vs Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
Key differences
DYTA is a fixed income ETF, while MATE is an alternative ETF. DYTA charges 1.32% a year and MATE 0.97%.
- DYTA is a fixed income fund, while MATE is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- DYTA follows a active selection strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
- MATE costs 0.35% less per year.
Side-by-side comparison
| DYTA | MATE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.32% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $101M | $39M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.52% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.12% | — |
| Max drawdown | -9.41% | -13.24% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.