Screener
DYTA vs MEMA
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF vs Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF
Key differences
DYTA is a fixed income ETF, while MEMA is an alternative ETF. DYTA charges 1.32% a year and MEMA 0.85%.
- DYTA is a fixed income fund, while MEMA is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- DYTA follows a active selection strategy; MEMA uses long short.
- MEMA costs 0.47% less per year.
- DYTA is much larger than MEMA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| DYTA | MEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.32% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $101M | $13M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.52% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.12% | — |
| Max drawdown | -9.41% | -13.12% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.