Skip to content
Screener

DYTA vs PHYL

SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF vs PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF

DYTA

SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF

Annual cost

1.32%

Fund size

$101M

PHYL

PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$1.3B

Key differences

Both DYTA and PHYL are fixed income ETFs. DYTA charges 1.32% a year and PHYL 0.39%. The main difference: PHYL costs 0.93% less per year.

  • PHYL costs 0.93% less per year.
  • PHYL is much larger than DYTA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, DYTA has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • PHYL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

DYTAPHYL
Annual cost (TER)1.32%0.39%
Fund size (AUM)$101M$1.3B
Since20232018
Dividend yield1.52%7.66%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+15.0%+7.2%
CAGR 3Y+11.8%+9.3%
CAGR 5YN/A+4.1%
Sharpe 3Y0.741.18
Volatility 1Y10.12%3.35%
Max drawdown-9.41%-22.07%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all fixed income funds

Similar to DYTA and PHYL