Screener
EAOK vs XRLX
iShares ESG Aware 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF vs FundX Conservative ETF
Key differences
- EAOK costs 1.02% less per year.
- XRLX is significantly larger than EAOK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EAOK follows a index tracking strategy; XRLX uses active selection.
- XRLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EAOK | XRLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 1.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $51M |
| Since | 2020 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 3.16% | 2.68% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.5% | +17.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.78 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.50% | 8.09% |
| Max drawdown | -19.91% | -15.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EAOK and XRLX
Explore further