Screener
XRLX vs EAOA
FundX Conservative ETF vs iShares ESG Aware 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
Key differences
- EAOA costs 1.02% less per year.
- XRLX follows a active selection strategy; EAOA uses index tracking.
- XRLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XRLX | EAOA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.20% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51M | $36M |
| Since | 2002 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 2.68% | 2.03% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.7% | +24.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.09% | 10.80% |
| Max drawdown | -15.34% | -25.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XRLX and EAOA
Explore further