Screener
EAOR vs SUSB
iShares ESG Aware 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF vs iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SUSB costs 0.06% less per year.
- SUSB is significantly larger than EAOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EAOR is classified as mixed asset, while SUSB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- EAOR follows a active selection strategy; SUSB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EAOR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EAOR | SUSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $32M | $1.1B |
| Since | 2020 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.41% | 4.49% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.7% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.7% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.5% | +2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 0.64 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.58% | 1.94% |
| Max drawdown | -22.91% | -13.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EAOR and SUSB
Explore further