Screener
EART vs NTSE
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF vs WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund
Key differences
- NTSE costs 0.27% less per year.
- EART covers global markets; NTSE covers emerging markets.
- EART follows a index tracking strategy; NTSE uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, NTSE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EART | NTSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $52M |
| Since | 2022 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 2.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +112.4% | +58.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.89% | 20.62% |
| Max drawdown | -53.67% | -42.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EART and NTSE
Explore further