Screener
EART vs NTSI
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF vs WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund
Key differences
- NTSI costs 0.33% less per year.
- NTSI is significantly larger than EART — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EART is classified as equity, while NTSI is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- EART follows a index tracking strategy; NTSI uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, EART has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EART | NTSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $486M |
| Since | 2022 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 3.60% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +112.4% | +22.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | +13.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.89% | 15.05% |
| Max drawdown | -53.67% | -34.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EART and NTSI
Explore further