Screener
EART vs NTSX
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF vs WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
Key differences
- NTSX costs 0.39% less per year.
- NTSX is significantly larger than EART — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EART covers global markets; NTSX covers north america.
- EART follows a index tracking strategy; NTSX uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| EART | NTSX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2022 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 1.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +112.4% | +28.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | +20.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.89% | 12.50% |
| Max drawdown | -53.67% | -31.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EART and NTSX
Explore further