Screener
EART vs SLVP
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF
Key differences
- SLVP costs 0.20% less per year.
- SLVP is significantly larger than EART — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SLVP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SLVP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EART | SLVP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $945M |
| Since | 2022 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 1.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +112.4% | +133.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | +51.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.89% | 52.96% |
| Max drawdown | -53.67% | -62.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EART and SLVP
Explore further