Screener
SLVP vs COPX
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF vs Global X Copper Miners ETF
Key differences
- SLVP costs 0.26% less per year.
- COPX is significantly larger than SLVP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SLVP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SLVP | COPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $945M | $7.4B |
| Since | 2012 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.72% | 2.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +129.6% | +113.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +50.1% | +33.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.0% | +17.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 52.87% | 40.77% |
| Max drawdown | -62.04% | -65.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SLVP and COPX
Explore further