Screener
EBIT vs AAVM
Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF vs Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF
Key differences
Both EBIT and AAVM are equity ETFs. EBIT charges 0.29% a year and AAVM 0.38%. The main difference: EBIT follows a index tracking strategy; AAVM uses active selection.
- EBIT follows a index tracking strategy; AAVM uses active selection.
- EBIT covers North America; AAVM covers global markets.
- EBIT costs 0.09% less per year.
- AAVM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EBIT | AAVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $26M |
| Since | 2024 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.78% | 1.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.8% | +32.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.20% | 15.96% |
| Max drawdown | -26.64% | -34.71% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.