Skip to content
Screener

ECML vs QVAL

Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF vs Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF

ECML

Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$131M

QVAL

Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF

Annual cost

0.28%

Fund size

$530M

Key differences

Both ECML and QVAL are equity ETFs. ECML charges 0.95% a year and QVAL 0.28%. The main difference: ECML follows a active selection strategy; QVAL uses systematic alpha.

  • ECML follows a active selection strategy; QVAL uses systematic alpha.
  • QVAL costs 0.67% less per year.
  • QVAL is much larger than ECML. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, QVAL has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • QVAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

ECMLQVAL
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.28%
Fund size (AUM)$131M$530M
Since20232014
Dividend yield1.22%1.46%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionsystematic alpha
CAGR 1Y+29.9%+31.5%
CAGR 3Y+14.7%+20.7%
CAGR 5YN/A+12.6%
Sharpe 3Y0.650.97
Volatility 1Y14.72%14.57%
Max drawdown-24.66%-51.49%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to ECML and QVAL