Screener
QVAL vs IVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF vs Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF
Key differences
- QVAL costs 0.10% less per year.
- QVAL follows a active selection strategy; IVAL uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, QVAL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QVAL | IVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $545M | $207M |
| Since | 2014 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.50% | 2.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.9% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.4% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.6% | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.60% | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -51.49% | -46.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QVAL and IVAL
Explore further