Screener
ECNS vs CNYA
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF vs iShares MSCI China A ETF
Key differences
- Over the last 3 years, CNYA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ECNS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ECNS | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $82M | $238M |
| Since | 2010 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 6.05% | 1.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.4% | +35.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.7% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.1% | -0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.25 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.87% | 17.18% |
| Max drawdown | -63.44% | -49.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ECNS and CNYA
Explore further