Screener
ECNS vs SCZ
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCZ costs 0.19% less per year.
- SCZ is significantly larger than ECNS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ECNS covers emerging markets markets; SCZ covers global ex us.
- Over the last 3 years, SCZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ECNS | SCZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $82M | $14.4B |
| Since | 2010 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 6.05% | 3.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.4% | +27.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.7% | +16.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.1% | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.25 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.87% | 14.50% |
| Max drawdown | -63.44% | -41.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ECNS and SCZ
Explore further