Screener
ECNS vs HSCZ
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF vs iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- HSCZ costs 0.16% less per year.
- ECNS covers emerging markets markets; HSCZ covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, HSCZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ECNS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ECNS | HSCZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.43% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $82M | $208M |
| Since | 2010 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 6.05% | 3.04% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.4% | +32.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.7% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.1% | +11.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.25 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.87% | 11.31% |
| Max drawdown | -63.44% | -34.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ECNS and HSCZ
Explore further