Screener
EDGF vs BINC
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF vs iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
Key differences
- BINC costs 0.39% less per year.
- BINC is significantly larger than EDGF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| EDGF | BINC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $506M | $16.9B |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 3.45% | 5.60% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | +6.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.97% | 2.29% |
| Max drawdown | -1.62% | -2.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EDGF and BINC
Explore further