Screener
EDGF vs BTOT
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF vs iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF
Key differences
- EDGF follows a active selection strategy; BTOT uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| EDGF | BTOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $506M | — |
| Since | 2024 | — |
| Dividend yield | 3.45% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.97% | — |
| Max drawdown | -1.62% | -2.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EDGF and BTOT
Explore further