Screener
EDGF vs IUSB
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF vs iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
Key differences
- IUSB costs 0.73% less per year.
- IUSB is significantly larger than EDGF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EDGF follows a active selection strategy; IUSB uses index tracking.
- IUSB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EDGF | IUSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $506M | $36.5B |
| Since | 2024 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 3.45% | 4.24% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.97% | 3.66% |
| Max drawdown | -1.62% | -17.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EDGF and IUSB
Explore further