Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EDGQ vs QYLD

Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF

EDGQ

Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF

Annual cost

Fund size

QYLD

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF

Global X Funds

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$8.3B

Key differences

  • EDGQ is classified as equity, while QYLD is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • EDGQ follows a active selection strategy; QYLD uses option income.

Side-by-side comparison

EDGQQYLD
Annual cost (TER)0.60%
Fund size (AUM)$8.3B
Since2013
Dividend yield11.47%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionoption income
CAGR 1YN/A+24.7%
CAGR 3YN/A+14.1%
CAGR 5YN/A+8.8%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.81
Volatility 1Y8.72%
Max drawdown-7.84%-24.75%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to EDGQ and QYLD