Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EDGQ vs RYLD

Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF

EDGQ

Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF

Annual cost

Fund size

RYLD

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF

Global X Funds

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$1.3B

Key differences

  • EDGQ is classified as equity, while RYLD is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • EDGQ follows a active selection strategy; RYLD uses option income.

Side-by-side comparison

EDGQRYLD
Annual cost (TER)0.60%
Fund size (AUM)$1.3B
Since2019
Dividend yield11.85%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionoption income
CAGR 1YN/A+23.1%
CAGR 3YN/A+7.4%
CAGR 5YN/A+2.8%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.35
Volatility 1Y10.82%
Max drawdown-7.84%-41.52%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to EDGQ and RYLD