Screener
EEM vs MCHI
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF vs iShares MSCI China ETF
Key differences
- MCHI costs 0.13% less per year.
- EEM is significantly larger than MCHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EEM | MCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28.1B | $6.7B |
| Since | 2003 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.91% | 2.21% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +51.5% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.6% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | -5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.88% | 20.00% |
| Max drawdown | -39.82% | -62.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EEM and MCHI
Explore further