Screener
MCHI vs EMXC
iShares MSCI China ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
Key differences
- EMXC costs 0.34% less per year.
- EMXC is significantly larger than MCHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EMXC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- MCHI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MCHI | EMXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.7B | $22.1B |
| Since | 2011 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.21% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | +73.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +29.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -5.0% | +13.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 1.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.00% | 21.58% |
| Max drawdown | -62.84% | -42.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MCHI and EMXC
Explore further