Screener
EEM vs MEMX
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF
Key differences
- EEM costs 0.07% less per year.
- EEM is significantly larger than MEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EEM follows a index tracking strategy; MEMX uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EEM | MEMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28.1B | $45M |
| Since | 2003 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.91% | 1.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.1% | +62.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +25.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.54% | 21.07% |
| Max drawdown | -39.82% | -19.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EEM and MEMX
Explore further