Screener
MEMX vs IEMG
Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- IEMG costs 0.70% less per year.
- IEMG is significantly larger than MEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MEMX follows a active selection strategy; IEMG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IEMG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MEMX | IEMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $45M | $151.2B |
| Since | 2023 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.72% | 2.37% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +62.2% | +44.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.6% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.07% | 19.02% |
| Max drawdown | -19.27% | -38.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MEMX and IEMG
Explore further