Screener
EEM vs PEMX
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF vs Putnam Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- EEM is significantly larger than PEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EEM follows a index tracking strategy; PEMX uses active selection.
- EEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EEM | PEMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28.1B | $20M |
| Since | 2003 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.91% | 1.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.1% | +62.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.54% | 21.02% |
| Max drawdown | -39.82% | -14.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EEM and PEMX
Explore further