Screener
PEMX vs EMXC
Putnam Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
Key differences
- EMXC costs 0.44% less per year.
- EMXC is significantly larger than PEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PEMX follows a active selection strategy; EMXC uses index tracking.
- EMXC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PEMX | EMXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $22.1B |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.22% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +62.5% | +65.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.02% | 21.14% |
| Max drawdown | -14.91% | -42.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PEMX and EMXC
Explore further