Screener
EEMA vs MCHI
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF vs iShares MSCI China ETF
Key differences
Both EEMA and MCHI are equity ETFs. EEMA charges 0.49% a year and MCHI 0.59%. The main difference: EEMA costs 0.10% less per year.
- EEMA costs 0.10% less per year.
- MCHI is much larger than EEMA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EEMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EEMA | MCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $6.3B |
| Since | 2012 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.18% | 2.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.8% | +1.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.6% | +10.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | -5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.37% | 20.20% |
| Max drawdown | -44.18% | -62.84% |
Similar to EEMA and MCHI
Explore further