Screener
EEMA vs SAMT
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF vs Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- EEMA costs 0.17% less per year.
- EEMA is classified as equity, while SAMT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- EEMA follows a index tracking strategy; SAMT uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, SAMT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EEMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EEMA | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $619M |
| Since | 2012 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.6% | +46.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.0% | +28.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.34% | 16.65% |
| Max drawdown | -44.18% | -20.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EEMA and SAMT
Explore further