Screener
EEMA vs AAXJ
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF vs iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
- EEMA costs 0.23% less per year.
- EEMA covers emerging markets markets; AAXJ covers asia pacific.
Side-by-side comparison
| EEMA | AAXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $3.8B |
| Since | 2012 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 1.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.6% | +48.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.4% | +22.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.95% | 19.80% |
| Max drawdown | -44.18% | -44.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EEMA and AAXJ
Explore further