Screener
EEMA vs SPEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- SPEM costs 0.42% less per year.
- SPEM is significantly larger than EEMA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EEMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EEMA | SPEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $17.3B |
| Since | 2012 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 2.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.6% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.4% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | +6.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.95% | 15.88% |
| Max drawdown | -44.18% | -36.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EEMA and SPEM
Explore further