Screener
EEMA vs XCNY
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- XCNY costs 0.30% less per year.
- EEMA is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EEMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EEMA | XCNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $9M |
| Since | 2012 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 2.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.6% | +32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.95% | 16.39% |
| Max drawdown | -44.18% | -19.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EEMA and XCNY
Explore further