Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EET vs EEM

ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

EET

ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$48M

EEM

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.72%

Fund size

$28.1B

Key differences

  • EEM costs 0.23% less per year.
  • EEM is significantly larger than EET — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • EET follows a leveraged strategy; EEM uses index tracking.
  • Over the last 3 years, EET has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • EEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

EETEEM
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.72%
Fund size (AUM)$48M$28.1B
Since20092003
Dividend yield1.45%1.91%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyleveragedindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+107.5%+51.5%
CAGR 3Y+37.9%+23.6%
CAGR 5Y+5.1%+7.5%
Sharpe 3Y0.971.07
Volatility 1Y39.49%19.88%
Max drawdown-69.06%-39.82%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to EET and EEM