Screener
EET vs EMXC
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
Key differences
- EMXC costs 0.70% less per year.
- EMXC is significantly larger than EET — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EET follows a leveraged strategy; EMXC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EET has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EET has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EET | EMXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $22.1B |
| Since | 2009 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +107.5% | +73.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +37.9% | +29.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.1% | +13.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 1.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 39.49% | 21.58% |
| Max drawdown | -69.06% | -42.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EET and EMXC
Explore further