Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EET vs EFU

ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets vs ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE

EET

ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$48M

EFU

ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$0.9M

Key differences

  • EET is significantly larger than EFU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • EET covers emerging markets markets; EFU covers global ex us.
  • EET follows a leveraged strategy; EFU uses inverse.
  • Over the last 3 years, EET has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

EETEFU
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$48M$0.9M
Since20092007
Dividend yield1.45%5.18%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsglobal ex us
Strategyleveragedinverse
CAGR 1Y+107.5%-32.6%
CAGR 3Y+37.9%-23.4%
CAGR 5Y+5.1%-16.5%
Sharpe 3Y0.97-0.82
Volatility 1Y39.49%31.13%
Max drawdown-69.06%-90.41%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to EET and EFU