Screener
EET vs EFZ
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets vs ProShares Short MSCI EAFE
Key differences
- EET is significantly larger than EFZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EET covers emerging markets markets; EFZ covers global ex us.
- EET follows a leveraged strategy; EFZ uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, EET has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EET | EFZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $16M |
| Since | 2009 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 3.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global ex us |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +107.5% | -15.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +37.9% | -9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.1% | -6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | -0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 39.49% | 16.44% |
| Max drawdown | -69.06% | -61.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EET and EFZ
Explore further