Screener
EET vs EZJ
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets vs ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
Key differences
- EET costs 0.22% less per year.
- EET is significantly larger than EZJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EET covers emerging markets markets; EZJ covers asia pacific.
- Over the last 3 years, EET has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EET | EZJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 1.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $13M |
| Since | 2009 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 1.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | leveraged | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +107.5% | +57.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +37.9% | +25.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.1% | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 39.49% | 40.31% |
| Max drawdown | -69.06% | -58.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EET and EZJ
Explore further