Screener
EZJ vs EEV
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan vs ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets
Key differences
- EEV costs 0.22% less per year.
- EZJ covers asia pacific markets; EEV covers emerging markets.
- EZJ follows a leveraged strategy; EEV uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, EZJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EZJ | EEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.17% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $6M |
| Since | 2009 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.77% | 6.16% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +57.6% | -57.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.2% | -33.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | -16.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | -1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.31% | 40.21% |
| Max drawdown | -58.63% | -93.83% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EZJ and EEV
Explore further