Screener
EFA vs AAXJ
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF vs iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
Both EFA and AAXJ are equity ETFs. EFA charges 0.32% a year and AAXJ 0.72%. The main difference: EFA covers global markets excluding the US; AAXJ covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- EFA covers global markets excluding the US; AAXJ covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- EFA costs 0.40% less per year.
- EFA is much larger than AAXJ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, AAXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFA | AAXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77.4B | $4.0B |
| Since | 2001 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 3.10% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.4% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.8% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | +5.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.27% | 21.53% |
| Max drawdown | -34.19% | -44.52% |
Similar to EFA and AAXJ
Explore further