Skip to content
Screener

EFA vs AOA

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF vs iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

EFA

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF

Annual cost

0.32%

Fund size

$77.4B

AOA

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$3.2B

Key differences

EFA is an equity ETF, while AOA is a mixed asset ETF. EFA charges 0.32% a year and AOA 0.15%.

  • EFA is an equity fund, while AOA is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • EFA covers global markets excluding the US; AOA covers North America.
  • AOA costs 0.17% less per year.
  • EFA is much larger than AOA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

EFAAOA
Annual cost (TER)0.32%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$77.4B$3.2B
Since20012008
Dividend yield3.10%2.05%
Asset classequitymixed asset
Regionglobal ex usnorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+21.3%+21.9%
CAGR 3Y+17.0%+17.2%
CAGR 5Y+8.4%+8.9%
Sharpe 3Y0.871.11
Volatility 1Y15.64%11.15%
Max drawdown-34.19%-28.38%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to EFA and AOA